# 12 วิธีลดต้นทุน PCB และ PCBA โดยไม่เสียคุณภาพ
ต้นทุน เป็นปัจจัยสำคัญในการแข่งขัน บทความนี้รวบรวม 12 วิธีลดต้นทุน PCB และ PCBA อย่างมีประสิทธิภาพ
---
สารบัญ
- PCB Design Optimization
- Material Selection
- Panel Utilization
- Layer Count Optimization
- Component Selection
- Assembly Optimization
- Volume Strategies
- Summary Table
---
PCB Cost Breakdown
```
Typical PCB Cost Structure
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
PCB Fabrication (30-40% of PCBA):
├── Material (base laminate) 25-35%
├── Processing (drilling, etc) 30-40%
├── Plating (copper, finish) 15-20%
├── Solder mask/silkscreen 5-10%
└── Testing/QC 5-10%
PCBA Cost (full assembly):
├── Bare PCB 15-25%
├── Components 50-70%
├── SMT Assembly 10-15%
├── Testing 3-5%
└── Others (packaging, etc) 5-10%
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
```
---
1-3. PCB Design Optimization {#design}
1. Board Size Reduction
| Action | Potential Savings |
|---|---|
| Reduce board area 10% | 8-12% PCB cost |
| Use smaller components | 5-15% area |
| Optimize layout | 5-10% area |
| Remove unused space | Variable |
2. Standard Specifications
```
Standard vs Premium PCB Specs
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
Parameter │ Standard │ Premium │ Cost Impact
─────────────────┼─────────────┼─────────────┼────────────
Min Trace/Space │ 6/6 mil │ 4/4 mil │ +20-30%
Min Hole │ 0.3mm │ 0.2mm │ +15-25%
Copper Weight │ 1oz │ 2oz+ │ +15-20%
Surface Finish │ HASL │ ENIG │ +10-15%
Solder Mask │ Green │ Other color │ +5-10%
Silkscreen │ One side │ Both sides │ +5%
Recommendation: Use standard specs unless required
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
```
3. DFM Compliance
เลี่ยงปัญหาที่เพิ่มต้นทุน:
- Tight tolerances
- Small annular rings
- Complex routing
- Via-in-pad (needs filling)
- Non-standard holes
---
4-6. Material & Structure {#materials}
4. Material Selection
| Material | Cost | When to Use |
|---|---|---|
| Standard FR4 | Low | Most applications |
| High Tg FR4 | Medium | Lead-free, high temp |
| Rogers/PTFE | High | RF only |
| Polyimide | High | Flex only |
5. Layer Count Optimization
```
Layer Count Cost Impact
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
Layers │ Relative Cost │ Notes
───────┼───────────────┼─────────────────────────────
2 │ 1.0x │ Baseline
4 │ 1.8-2.2x │ Most common
6 │ 2.5-3.0x │ +40% vs 4-layer
8 │ 3.5-4.0x │ Complex designs
10+ │ 4.5x+ │ HDI territory
Cost saving tips:
├── Can 6-layer become 4-layer with routing optimization?
├── Use thinner dielectric where possible
└── Consider sequential lamination alternatives
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
```
6. Panel Utilization
เพิ่ม utilization = ลดต้นทุน/board
```
Panel Utilization Example
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
Standard panel: 18" x 24" (457 x 610mm)
Board size: 100 x 80mm
Option A: Standard array
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ ┌────┐ ┌────┐ ┌────┐ ┌────┐ ┌────┐ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ 5 x 6 = 30 pcs │
│ └────┘ └────┘ └────┘ └────┘ └────┘ │
│ ┌────┐ ┌────┐ ┌────┐ ┌────┐ ┌────┐ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ Utilization: 66% │
│ └────┘ └────┘ └────┘ └────┘ └────┘ │
│ ... (6 rows) │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Option B: Rotated/optimized
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ ┌──┐┌──┐┌──┐┌──┐┌──┐┌──┐ │
│ │ ││ ││ ││ ││ ││ │ 6 x 7 = 42 pcs │
│ └──┘└──┘└──┘└──┘└──┘└──┘ │
│ ┌──┐┌──┐┌──┐┌──┐┌──┐┌──┐ Utilization: 80% │
│ │ ││ ││ ││ ││ ││ │ │
│ └──┘└──┘└──┘└──┘└──┘└──┘ 40% more boards! │
│ ... (7 rows) │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
```
---
7-9. Component Optimization {#components}
7. Component Selection
| Strategy | Potential Savings |
|---|---|
| Use common values | 5-10% BOM |
| Avoid obsolete parts | Avoid premiums |
| Specify alternates | Better pricing |
| Reduce unique part numbers | Volume discount |
8. BOM Consolidation
```
BOM Optimization Example
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
Before:
├── 100nF X7R 0402 16V (50 pcs)
├── 100nF X5R 0402 10V (30 pcs)
├── 100nF X7R 0603 16V (20 pcs)
└── Total: 3 line items
After:
├── 100nF X7R 0402 25V (100 pcs)
└── Total: 1 line item
Benefits:
├── Volume discount
├── Fewer feeders (assembly)
├── Less inventory
└── Simpler sourcing
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
```
9. Package Selection
| Smaller Package | Larger Package |
|---|---|
| Cheaper component | More expensive |
| Harder to assemble | Easier to assemble |
| Smaller board possible | Larger board |
| Balance: 0402 is sweet spot for most |
---
10-12. Production Optimization {#assembly}
10. Assembly Design
| DFA Tip | Benefit |
|---|---|
| Single-side assembly | 30-40% assembly cost |
| Standard footprints | Faster setup |
| Consistent orientation | Fewer feeder changes |
| Minimize rework | Reduce labor |
11. Testing Strategy
| Volume | Recommended Test |
|---|---|
| <100 | Flying Probe + FCT |
| 100-500 | Flying Probe or ICT + FCT |
| >500 | ICT + FCT (fixture ROI) |
| >5000 | Inline ICT + FCT |
12. Volume Strategies
```
Volume Discount Example
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
PCB Price per Unit:
Quantity │ Price/Unit │ Savings vs 100
─────────┼────────────┼───────────────
100 │ $5.00 │ Baseline
500 │ $3.50 │ -30%
1,000 │ $2.80 │ -44%
5,000 │ $2.00 │ -60%
10,000 │ $1.60 │ -68%
Strategy: Consolidate orders where possible
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
```
---
Summary Table {#summary}
Quick Reference
| Category | Strategy | Typical Savings |
|---|---|---|
| Design | Board size reduction | 8-15% |
| Design | Standard specs | 15-30% |
| Design | DFM compliance | 5-10% |
| Material | Standard FR4 | 10-40% |
| Structure | Layer optimization | 20-40% |
| Panel | Better utilization | 10-30% |
| Component | BOM consolidation | 5-15% |
| Component | Volume buying | 10-30% |
| Assembly | Single-side SMT | 30-40% |
| Test | Appropriate test | 5-20% |
---
บทสรุป
> สรุปจากผู้เชี่ยวชาญ: "Cost reduction ต้องเริ่มตั้งแต่ design 80% ของต้นทุนถูก lock ตั้งแต่ design phase การพยายามลดต้นทุนทีหลังมักได้ผลน้อยและอาจกระทบคุณภาพ ทำ DFM review ตั้งแต่ต้น" — Hommer Zhao
---
บริการของเรา
PCB Thailand ช่วยลดต้นทุน:
- DFM Review ฟรี
- Panel Optimization
- BOM Alternatives
- Volume Discounts
ติดต่อเรา สำหรับ quote comparison
---
![12 วิธีลดต้นทุน PCB และ PCBA โดยไม่เสียคุณภาพ [2024]](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimages.pcbthailand.com%2FPCB-Panel-Array.webp&w=3840&q=75)
![จาก Prototype สู่ Production: 8 ขั้นตอนสำคัญ [คู่มือ 2024]](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimages.pcbthailand.com%2FPCB-Mass-Production.webp&w=3840&q=75)